I wouldn't be surprised if people stop telling ghost stories in the future. Much like how the idea of telling the stories ancient people told about their gods would seem a bit silly now; the narratives will simply no longer have the need to exist.
Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.
I wouldn't be surprised if people stop telling ghost stories in the future. Much like how the idea of telling the stories ancient people told about their gods would seem a bit silly now; the narratives will simply no longer have the need to exist.
Dating sites seem to be an interesting ground for people trying to figure out new ways to better understand "want"; it doesn't seem to come through the literal "judge someone's bio & profile" approach. See also http://www.howaboutwe.com.
People have long been aware that, during big TV moments--epic sports contests or the finale of Lost, for example--the Twittersphere rapidly fills up with TV-related hashtags. Last week Google Ventures invested in Miso, a social TV app that allows users to comment on their TV shows as they happen. Miso, however, is not the only fish in the social TV app sea. As well as Comcast's Tunerfish, there is Starling, a startup that launched back in April at MIPtv in Cannes, whose aim is "enhancing the real-time experience" of watching television, according to its President of the Americas, Kenny Miller.
The above is from an article earlier this year covering the development of social TV.
Google Ventures is an excellent reminder that internal R&D departments don't exist anymore, only investments in innovative thinkers organizing around the globe.
Research & Enabling Department (R&E)?
We live in a world of ubiquitous computing -- there are ever more computing devices everywhere.We will soon live in a world of ubiquitous video cameras. You probably have one staring at you right now just inches away from your face -- the camera in your laptop or desktop ... It will be as if there is always a "fly on the wall" watching and recording everything.
People will carry what I call a "personal fly" -- a personal security device containing a tiny video camera fitted into a pendant or broach, embedded in clothing, earrings, or in eye glasses. ...
What interests me is how such personal security devices (PSDs) will affect our behavior in our social spaces. What will be the new manners?
- Will it be rude to wear a personal security device at a dinner party?
- WIll it be rude to ask someone to turn off their PSD?
- How can you know if someone's PSD is on or off? (You can't know for sure...)
- Will it be rude to archive all your recordings? ...
Surveillance by Big Brother is less scary than surveillance by each other, by people you know and know you.
New York Times reports on a disturbing trend among college students who are simply unmindful or intentionally involved in plagiarism when it comes to using resources from the web. Several surveys conducted have proved that many students do not cite the author or credit the source when copying from a site, even believing its not “serious cheating”. The Times adds that the Internet may be changing the way how students understand the concept of authorship on the web.
Now we have a whole generation of students who’ve grown up with information that just seems to be hanging out there in cyberspace and doesn’t seem to have an author,” said Teresa Fishman, director of the Center for Academic Integrity at Clemson University. “It’s possible to believe this information is just out there for anyone to take.
But why is this phenomenon of plagiarism so widespread in the digital world? Sarah Brookover, a student at the Rutgers University provides an apt explanation:
This generation has always existed in a world where media and intellectual property don’t have the same gravity. When you’re sitting at your computer, it’s the same machine you’ve downloaded music with, possibly illegally, the same machine you streamed videos for free that showed on HBO last night. Because you’re not walking into a library, you’re not physically holding the article, which takes you closer to ‘this doesn’t belong to me,’ ” she said. Online, “everything can belong to you really easily.”
NY Times: “Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age”
via psfk.comA fantastic discussion brewing around this development. On one level this is about the form/style of attribution, and it's relation to academic honesty, etc. On another it reflects the impact of digital accessibility to/ephemeralization of content - most notably manifested in notions like Faris' idea of recombinant culture/remix culture; one critical question here is "to what extent is one person's ideas their own?" It's a question that can now be asked and studied in a meaningful way directly because this digitization.