How To Break Anything

Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.

  • About
  • Weak Signals
  • nanotrends & links
    • 1
      9 Jun 2011

      A type of change blindness that distinguishes "microtrends" from "macrotrends"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Google's search for future profit targets the Sun, not just the cloud
      Published on Teradome. | shared via feedly
      Google's search for future profit targets the Sun, not just the cloud:

      These humble-looking contraptions were revealed in a Google patent application for a “heliostat control system” that automatically adjusts solar thermal mirrors to their optimal energy-harvesting angle. […] Sound like a strange distraction for an Internet company?

      Nope. Internet doesn’t exist without power. Therefore, Google should have an interest in the energy industry.

       

      Imagine for a moment that you, ten years ago, started thinking about a world in which the major players were competing on the level not of their products but of their ecosystems. Then enters Apple/Google/Facebook.

      The "who would have seen Apple and Facebook and Google being so influential back in 2001" point is now something we're familiar with. But back then it would seem a bit unfamiliar. Another idea that would seem a bit unfamiliar is a world 10 years in the future in which the major players compete again not based on their products or even their ecosystems of apps and data and developers, but the surrounding industries that provide resources and power as alluded to above.

      The above thoughts remind me of that unfamiliarity, and remind me that we all get the microtrends (the gamifications, the connected screens, the cloud thinking, etc), and it's easy to think that follow "trends," but the macrotrends that the above article alludes to still catch all of us off guard.  

      When people ask about trends I tend to find myself needing to distinguish between micro and macro trends, a model I've taken from Magnus Lindkvist's Everything We Know is Wrong!: The Trendspotter's Handbook. I'm guessing he'd refer to the above as a form of change blindness, the kind of change blindness that manifests in the inability to detect large change because it looks too different from our current model of the world. 

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      13 Dec 2010

      Access Beats Ownership In The Age Of Cloud Computing

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Google Cloud Computing

      In the recent publication 20 Things I Learned About Browsers And The Web, Google touches on how digital storage capacity, ubiquitous access, and increased bandwidth have all blossomed over the last decade, resulting in the notion of cloud computing. We’re now seeing a couple of ideas that demonstrate how this notion has affected the way we manipulate not only digital files but physical ones as well — and even our ideas of storage and ownership at large.

      One example is the service StorageByMail, something of a cloud storage service for physical items. Springwise explains below:

      StorageByMail maintains a world-class storage facility that’s also used by brands including Bloomingdale’s and Tommy Hilfiger. Customers of the service begin by creating an account and an online description of any package of goods they’d like to send into storage. Next, they print a custom, prepaid USPS shipping label for each box they’d like to send; those labels ensure safe passage for the goods through the U.S. Postal Service to StorageByMail’s warehouse. When the customer wants them back, he or she simply requests return delivery and the company will ship them out the next business day.

      Another interesting thought appears in a Metafilter thread titled Collect ‘em all, by a user named Pastabagel:

      Coveting possessions is unhealthy. Here’s how I look at it:

      All of the computers on Ebay are mine. In fact, everything on Ebay is already mine. All of those things are just in long term storage that I pay nothing for. Storage is free.

      When I want to take something out of storage, I just pay the for the storage costs for that particular thing up to that point, plus a nominal shipping fee, and my things are delivered to me so I can use them. When I am done with them, I return them to storage via Craigslist or Ebay, and I am given a fee as compensation for freeing up the storage facilities resources.

      This is also the case with all of my stuff that Amazon and Walmart are holding for me. I have antiques, priceless art, cars, estates, and jewels beyond the dreams of avarice.

      The world is my museum, displaying my collections on loan. The James Savages of the world are merely curators.

      As I am the curator of their things, and thus together we all share the world.

      We expect to see more ideas emerge that point to the shifting nature of ownership; the idea that access beats ownership seems to be implicit in the popularity of digital content services ranging from Netflix to Spotify.

      Storage By Mail

      20 Things I Learned About Browsers And The Web

      this post originally appeared on psfk.com

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      12 Aug 2010

      A Guide To Long-Term Perspective On Trends

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Hello friends, readers, and legions of followers. I've organized a panel in consideration of SXSW 2011, titled A Guide To Long-Term Perspective On Trends. The synopsis is below; I'd be entirely thankful if you were to follow on over and click the thumbs up vote as hard as you can. 
      This discussion will inspire attendees with the means to observe short-term phenomena through the lens of long-term perspective.

      Many savvy SXSW attendees follow immediate-term trends as part of their daily business; this level of trend includes new technologies/platforms & hot items of public discourse. Just beyond this level of trend exist short-term microtrends, which help explain the 2-5 year impact of immediate-term trends by highlighting patterns that emerge through analysis of individual manifestations.

      Understanding these types of trends is indeed important, but this discussion aims to illuminate how these short-term patterns fit within long-term sociological narratives that span decades. These are difficult to see manifest, and it is even more difficult to consider how they might impact long-term value when making decisions about the near-term.

      Attendees will leave with insight on why long-term perspective is valuable to anyone hoping to design tools that speak to fundamental human truths. The concepts of "revolution vs evolution" and change blindness play important roles in our story, as considerations in capturing perspective on present-day developments.

      This discussion does not aim to teach attendees how to predict future trends. Instead it will provide the tools for thinking about micro-level manifestations within a macro-level scale of historical development, as a way to better think about potential implications for the future.

      via panelpicker.sxsw.com

      Thanks for considering this concept. The team at SXSW had nice things to say about it in their confirmation letter; I agree with their sentiment and the sentiment of the commenters thus far that it's a discussion that we could all stand to be a part of. I try to speak to this briefly in the above - most SXSW attendees and readers here are all quite savvy when it comes to staying abreast of daily culture and hot items of public interest. But there's also deeper value in being able to pull out long-term patterns from analysis of these nanotrends, driven by an understanding of how humans fundamentally interact with each other and their technologies that is grounded in historical consistencies. 

      This is organized as a dual-panel discussion, which leaves room for fascinating friends of PSFK who have identified interest in sharing their great insight on long-term perspective. We're looking forward to this as an exploration of value, as it applies to seeing past the hype and excitement of near-term nanotrends into capturing a deeper socio/techno-cultural understanding of how people interact in the world.

       

      Update: Timely enough, Seth here has just shared some thoughts on this exact subject, in characteristically pithy fashion; do read on, if you're interested: Resilience and the incredible power of slow change

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      6 Feb 2010

      A goldmine of insight on cultural externalities and the paradoxical nature of human behavior

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      via designologic.net

      My favorite slides are 65 and 70. They have a lot to say about the mercurial (arbitrary?) nature of meaning and what matters to us.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Tags

      • perspective
      • value
      • metasocioculture
      • culture
      • long-term thinking
      • decisionmaking
      • offline inspiration
      • cognitive fallacies
      • future
      • time-orientation
      • limitation
      • perception
      • causality
      • definition
      • irrationality
      • art
      • behavioral economics
      • game mechanics
      • emergence
      • experience
      • exposure
      • observe everything
      • philosophy
      • programming
      • human insight
      • illusion
      • paradox
      • privacy
      • reactionary
      • want
      • worry
      • adaptation
      • advertising
      • behavior
      • design strategy
      • evolution
      • identity
      • metaphors
      • networks
      • optimization
      • shortsightedness
      • social interactions
      • weak signals
      • connections
      • counterintuitive
      • doomsday
      • feedback loops
      • indirect
      • meaning
      • tangible data
      • context
      • glanceable
      • memory
      • motivation
      • seeming
      • utopia
      • chronological proportionality
      • cognitive environments
      • complexity
      • control
      • cyborg anthropology
      • gaming
      • happiness
      • human programming
      • information art
      • nostalgia
      • rationality
      • scarcity
      • technosocial
      • time
      • timeline
      • Entrepreneur
      • PSEA
      • asking the right questions
      • classification
      • cultural narratives
      • data
      • deception
      • design thinking
      • filter theory
      • games
      • habitat media
      • historical context
      • information theory
      • intelligence
      • levels of abstraction
      • linguistic programming
      • metaphysics
      • nonlinear
      • optimaization
      • organization
      • patina
      • pattern recognition
      • reactive culture
      • serendipity filters
      • truth
      • wisdom
      • wonder
      • youth
    • Archive

      • 2012 (60)
        • May (11)
        • April (14)
        • March (9)
        • February (13)
        • January (13)
      • 2011 (188)
        • December (14)
        • November (6)
        • October (6)
        • September (9)
        • August (9)
        • July (26)
        • June (21)
        • May (12)
        • April (17)
        • March (21)
        • February (25)
        • January (22)
      • 2010 (214)
        • December (22)
        • November (14)
        • October (8)
        • September (7)
        • August (13)
        • July (17)
        • June (16)
        • May (16)
        • April (22)
        • March (36)
        • February (31)
        • January (12)
      • 2009 (95)
        • December (6)
        • November (9)
        • October (9)
        • September (8)
        • August (6)
        • July (2)
        • June (9)
        • May (17)
        • April (7)
        • March (8)
        • February (7)
        • January (7)
      • 2008 (47)
        • December (10)
        • November (12)
        • October (7)
        • September (7)
        • August (4)
        • July (3)
        • May (1)
        • April (1)
        • March (1)
        • January (1)
      • 2007 (4)
        • October (1)
        • September (3)
    • Contributors

      Kyle Cameron Studstill
    • Obox Design
  • How To Break Anything

    Hello friends and collaborators. I deal in innovation, working to build fantastic experiences enabled by the digital world. As part of this I track cultural change, primarily through observations guided by models and filters calibrated over years to sort out the cream.

    These pieces of thoughts here reflect concepts that are elements of those models: ecosystem thinking, long-term value, information filters, and pattern recognition.

    ("How to break anything" is an abstract notion that reflects my background in observation and analysis. Rules are meant to be broken, but only through understanding the rules - observing them with an empathetic eye - can they be broken constructively.

    So how to break anything? Observe everything.

    [You can't observe everything so how do you know what to observe? That's another project that I call Filter Theory - see the About link above.])

    268055 Views
  • Get Updates

    Follow this Space »
    You're following this Space (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook