How To Break Anything

Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.

  • About
  • Weak Signals
  • nanotrends & links
    • 0
      4 Mar 2011

      from: The Strange Powers of the Placebo Effect

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      via kevinmd.com

      Might end up calling this "manufactured value through cognitive programming."

      Again, I don't necessarily think there's anything less 'real' about the things that we don't immediately understand as 'real.'

      In fact, I'll probably expand on this later, but it's been on my mind that I've become something of a "modified relativist." That is to say, I'll argue against absolute truths like the "realness" of things, but I'll concede something like "there are levels of truth that - in an absolute sense - either matter or don't matter to humans."

      For example, the true nature of a plank of wood may be a strange blend of space and quantum particles that scientists are now starting to discover may or may not exist in two places at once, and on some level it's fascinating to question the nature of its reality, but when the plank hits you across the face that's probably not the first thing that comes to mind.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      22 Dec 2010

      Philosopher vs Scientist, on asking and answering the right questions

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      When people ask me what philosophy is, I say philosophy is what you do when you don't know what the right questions are yet. Once you get the questions right, then you go answer them, and that's typically not philosophy, that's one science or another. Anywhere in life where you find that people aren't quite sure what the right questions to ask are, what they're doing, then, is philosophy.

      -- Daniel Dennett

      via people.mokk.bme.hu

      See also: One Model For Thinking About Roles And Relationships: Philosopher/Scientist/Entrepreneur/Artist. This was an initial go at thinking about how these roles relate to each other.

       

      See also Paul Bennet, IDEO on asking the right questions:

      via youtube.com

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      1 Aug 2010

      Art distinguished from handicraft

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Photo

      The above is from Analytic of the Sublime within Kant's Critique of Judgment; his distinction between art and handicraft is characteristic of Seth Godin's idea of art as a gift in his book Linchpin.

      As you may know, Kant is known for his demanding definitions. Relevant in this case is the definition of "free," as in "free to create something of value." For Kant, no act is free if it is ultimately by an external motive. That is to say, if the motivation is money, then the act is not art, because the thing ultimately driving the act is not the doer but the thing providing the reward (this actually applies even if the intent is to use the money for something internal, like the desire for food - in this case, nature is the driver, not the thinker). No large point here, just another exploration of natural value in contrast to monetary value to consider.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      5 Jul 2010

      "Versions" by Oliver Laric, and a few thoughts on considering the value of images, mimicry, and 'realness'

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      oliver laric versions 2010

      “Versions” is a visual essay by Oliver Laric, investigating the re-appropriation and manipulation of images in our culture.

       

      Watch the video here.

      via booooooom.com

      Oliver Laric does a lot of good thinking on the nature of images, in the "images as reproductions of 'real' things" sense. Click the link above for the video essay in full.

      One question to ask here is: given the nature of how humans engage in and and experience the world (primarily through mimicry, the social creatures that we are), how should we measure the relative values of things like authorship, creation, motivation (in the "foundation of copyright law" sense), volition, experience and individuality?

      These things (and surely there are plenty more) seem to all point to why we intuitively think some things are more "real" than others. Like Oliver and many others I find myself exploring the validity of these instincts a little deeper as well.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      11 May 2010

      What time travel might look like - perception, relativity, etc

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Black_hole

      A bit of abstract thinking out loud, since there's been a good amount of buzz on time travel floating around lately with Stephen Hawking's most recent comments.

      The thing about time travel is that because we humans are naturally blinded to see things only from our own individual perspectives, I suspect our natural assumptions about distorting time are a bit backwards.

      That is to say: we think about "time travel" as a phenomenon primarily concerned about how we would be seeing the world through time.

      This phenomenon might better be described as the way the rest of the world sees us.

      This isn't too profound on some level - special relativity and general relativity is precisely about the perception of others.

      A way to clarify this is to think about the event horizon, which is the point in space at which light can no longer escape the gravity of a black hole. As a primer:

      Special relativity illustrates that because 'time' is intrinsically interwoven with perception, that perception (particularly what we 'see' on a watch) will change at very high speeds and within high gravitational fields - as we approach the speed of light (either through our moving fast enough or it's moving slow enough thanks to gravity), the perception of what it 'shows' us changes completely. This is why time slows down at high speeds and in high gravitational fields, measured by the comparison of two watches that have moved through different conditions. 

      One key point about relativity is that you don't notice this, others do. In fact, that's precisely why the term 'relativity' is used. 

      Back to the event horizon: 

      If you were able to observe someone moving towards a black hole, what you would be observing is the light reflecting off them. At some point - just past the event horizon - this light would never be able to escape the gravity of the black hole. At this point in the gravitational field, their watch would slow down to the point that it has actually stopped. The light that you perceive would be frozen. They of course would continue moving towards the black hole, and would perceive all the grisly experiences that come along with things like being ripped apart by gravity, but for you, they have been frozen in time. 

      I'm wondering if this is what we will discover "time travel" to be: not our own individual selves moving through space-time, but the relative perception of the world moving around us.

      In other words, when we "travel through time," we won't notice - others will. 

      [img/meaningful metaphor via fernando]
      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      6 May 2010

      Cognitive bias video/song, and some thoughts on optimization

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

       

      Totally love the above video @fatgator passed along to me ha.
       
      At some point in life one of the questions you have to answer for yourself is this:
       
      To what degree is cognitive bias a fundamentally negative part of the human condition? 
       
      For example, the charge behind lesswrong.org is that bias is fundamentally wrong in the purest sense of the word; one's goal should be to become less biased, thus optimizing one's life. 
       
      There's another angle that wonders what it means for the universe to even have something like "wrong in the most pure sense of the word." This has to do with the question: what does it even mean to optimize one's life?
       
      The quintessential example is the machine that knows so much about you that it can perfectly 'optimize' your life (and I mean optimize in the purest sense of the word - that is to say that it is unbiased, perfectly calculating, and error-free): when it tells you in a morning email exactly all the steps to follow in order to have an 'optimized' life, do you follow it to the letter? 
       
      I've only been asking this question for a couple months but I have yet to run into someone who calls this 'optimal.' 
       
      In other words, even optimization strategies have optimization strategies. 
       
      Just a thought, but it's what I think about when I wonder about the idea of 'better living through less bias.'  

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 2
      22 Mar 2010

      Historians, more than anyone, know that there are no firsts

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Today’s idea: In a way, blogging isn’t all that new, a historian says. Informal writing combining pithiness with provocation stirred up the politics of Renaissance Italy and prerevolutionary France. And in light of the Web, it deserves more study.
      via ideas.blogs.nytimes.com


      [from "In Search of Time," on various cultures' adoption of lunar-solar calendars]

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      21 Mar 2010

      Homo Modernus - some deeply metaphorical/metaphysical thoughts on the future of humanity

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      via socialhallucinations.com

      An entirely fascinating set of thoughts on the future of humanity. Being deeply metaphorical it takes some time to really get what is going on, but before too long you can probably start to reflect on some of the statements and relate in some way.

      Although:

      I'm never much for doomsday scenarios; were it the case that the future is a scary place, well, it's been happening for centuries.

      In other words, we presently live in the scary future that past generations predicted.

      In other words, the scary future we're predicting now will feel exactly the same as the "scary present" feels today.

      In other words, everything's going to be OK.

      In other words, if there is some point along the timeline of humanity at which the threshold from absolute metaphysical "goodness" can be crossed into absolute metaphysical "tragedy," then either 1) it has already happened or 2) we won't notice when it does happen.

      In other words, everything is going to be OK

      (There is a valid counterpoint here, and it is to say that the present absolutely is scary, and things are not OK today. I just find that to be a sad way to live life.)

       
      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Tags

      • perspective
      • value
      • metasocioculture
      • culture
      • long-term thinking
      • decisionmaking
      • offline inspiration
      • cognitive fallacies
      • future
      • time-orientation
      • limitation
      • perception
      • causality
      • definition
      • irrationality
      • art
      • behavioral economics
      • game mechanics
      • emergence
      • experience
      • exposure
      • observe everything
      • programming
      • human insight
      • illusion
      • paradox
      • privacy
      • reactionary
      • want
      • worry
      • adaptation
      • advertising
      • behavior
      • design strategy
      • evolution
      • identity
      • metaphors
      • networks
      • optimization
      • shortsightedness
      • social interactions
      • weak signals
      • connections
      • counterintuitive
      • doomsday
      • feedback loops
      • indirect
      • meaning
      • tangible data
      • context
      • glanceable
      • motivation
      • seeming
      • trends
      • utopia
      • cognitive environments
      • complexity
      • control
      • cyborg anthropology
      • gaming
      • happiness
      • human programming
      • information art
      • memory
      • nostalgia
      • rationality
      • scarcity
      • technosocial
      • time
      • timeline
      • Entrepreneur
      • PSEA
      • chronological proportionality
      • classification
      • cultural narratives
      • data
      • deception
      • design thinking
      • filter theory
      • games
      • information theory
      • intelligence
      • levels of abstraction
      • linguistic programming
      • metaphysics
      • nonlinear
      • optimaization
      • organization
      • patina
      • pattern recognition
      • truth
      • wisdom
      • wonder
      • youth
      • Artist
      • MTurk
      • ROI
      • Scientist
      • adversity
    • Archive

      • 2012 (15)
        • February (2)
        • January (13)
      • 2011 (188)
        • December (14)
        • November (6)
        • October (6)
        • September (9)
        • August (9)
        • July (26)
        • June (21)
        • May (12)
        • April (17)
        • March (21)
        • February (25)
        • January (22)
      • 2010 (214)
        • December (22)
        • November (14)
        • October (8)
        • September (7)
        • August (13)
        • July (17)
        • June (16)
        • May (16)
        • April (22)
        • March (36)
        • February (31)
        • January (12)
      • 2009 (95)
        • December (6)
        • November (9)
        • October (9)
        • September (8)
        • August (6)
        • July (2)
        • June (9)
        • May (17)
        • April (7)
        • March (8)
        • February (7)
        • January (7)
      • 2008 (47)
        • December (10)
        • November (12)
        • October (7)
        • September (7)
        • August (4)
        • July (3)
        • May (1)
        • April (1)
        • March (1)
        • January (1)
      • 2007 (4)
        • October (1)
        • September (3)
    • Contributors

      Kyle Cameron Studstill
    • Obox Design
  • How To Break Anything

    Hello friends and collaborators. I deal in innovation, working to build fantastic experiences enabled by the digital world. As part of this I track cultural change, primarily through observations guided by models and filters calibrated over years to sort out the cream.

    These pieces of thoughts here reflect concepts that are elements of those models: ecosystem thinking, long-term value, information filters, and pattern recognition.

    ("How to break anything" is an abstract notion that reflects my background in observation and analysis. Rules are meant to be broken, but only through understanding the rules - observing them with an empathetic eye - can they be broken constructively.

    So how to break anything? Observe everything.

    [You can't observe everything so how do you know what to observe? That's another project that I call Filter Theory - see the About link above.])

    254031 Views
  • Get Updates

    Follow this Space »
    You're following this Space (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook