How To Break Anything

Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.

  • About
  • Weak Signals
  • nanotrends & links
    • 1
      7 Dec 2011

      Genre-creating metaphors, from: "digital maximalism"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      *Simon Reynolds writing in Pitchfork. This guy is the maestro of what’s happening now, and why it’s happening now, and why you probably shouldn’t listen to it.

      http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/8721-maximal-nation/

      (…)

      “Compared with the analog hardware that underpinned early house and techno, the digital software used by the vast majority of dance producers today has an inherent tendency towards maximalism. In an article for Loops, Matthew Ingram (who records as Woebot) wrote about how digital audio workstations like Ableton Live and FL Studio encourage “interminable layering” and how the graphic interface insidiously inculcates a view of music as “a giant sandwich of vertically arranged elements stacked upon one another.” Meanwhile, the software’s scope for tweaking the parameters of any given sonic event opens up a potential “bad infinity” abyss of fiddly fine-tuning. When digital software meshes with the minimalist aesthetic you get what Ingram calls “audio trickle”: a finicky focus on sound-design, intricate fluctuations in rhythm, and other minutiae that will be awfully familiar to anyone who has followed mnml or post-dubstep during the last decade. But now that same digital technology is getting deployed to opposite purposes: rococo-florid riffs, eruptions of digitally-enhanced virtuosity, skyscraping solos, and other “maxutiae,” all daubed from a palette of fluorescent primary colors. Audio trickle has given way to audio torrent– the frothing extravagance of fountain gardens in the Versailles style….”

      via wired.com

      A bit wordy, particularly if you don't follow music as closely as Reynolds in the above. But here's the point:

      The music we create has always been shaped by the instruments we have to make it. But the above is interesting because it's now so easy to create instruments that various design philosophies emerge to distinguish them. As Reynolds notes, these design philosophies shape the nature of the music itself.

      I'll take a leap to help explain, referencing something a little more familiar:

      Dubstep exists as a genre because of the way music production tools are designed today. On some level that's not too profound. On another level this reflects the fact that at some point the designers of these production tools had to make decisions about how what the interface will look like; they happened to decide on a particular set of metaphors, and an entire genre is the result.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      26 Jun 2011

      Mixed metaphors, from "The Misleading Thermodynamic Theory of Being"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      “Modern psychology began to flourish at a time when the thermodynamics theory of heat and the theory of potential were finally put on a firm basis and clearly formulated by some of the most eminent scientists of that time. Thus, the idea that energy can neither be created nor destroyed became more or less common knowledge. Any educated person knew this, and it was quite natural to formulate the libido theory on the same lines, that is, to be analogous with the energy theory. Emotional energy could accumulate, be dammed up; and, as it could not be destroyed, either steam had to be let off or sublimation had to take place. The same background prevails today and some excellent authors, who now see quite clearly the fallacy in the libido analogy, inadvertently make the same mistake with other emotional manifestations — such as aggression.
      via sheilaheti.tumblr.com

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 1
      11 Apr 2011

      Moving ideas cognitively to create metaphor seems just as critical "work" as moving stones physically to build the foundation of a house.

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      via designmind.frogdesign.com

      Not that it would make sense for you to jump straight to slide 47 in the above, but that bit on metaphor stands out to me; I've been thinking much lately on how deeply connections and metaphor are threaded into the way we experience and make sense of the world.

      Moving ideas cognitively to create metaphor seems just as critical "work" as moving stones physically to build the foundation of a house.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 2
      9 Mar 2011

      from No Right Brain Left Behind » Nodes

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Elevator

      Nodes is a software solution that shows the relationship between seemingly divergent topics through a simple graphic interface. Search a subject term and Nodes creates a network of topics (obvious or obscure) that relate in some way. This system would be grown by a global community that tags articles and helps build the connections.

      Description

      One of the signature characteristics of a creative mind is the ability to see problems from different angles. Today, more and more industries are looking for individuals who can dynamically approach problems from varying points of view. Yet, our current educational system promotes understanding the world via single-problem/single-solution relationships. The question then stands, how do we train students to think holistically when they are only being fed myopic causal relationships?

      Nodes is a software solution that allows teachers and students to immediately see the relationship between seemingly divergent topics through a simple graphic interface. The user would populate the search field in the center of Nodes and then points of information would populate the screen for the user to explore. Any topic could be entered and evaluated. Say for instance the user was to enter “American Revolution.” Nodes would send the query to our servers and reply with things such as:

      Athens – Birthplace of the ideology that would become the North Star of modern governments around the Globe.

      2011 Egyptian Revolution – An example of a modern revolution and a fight for freedom.

      Triangle Trade – Trade circle between the Americas, Europe, and Africa.

      Anti-Smoking Legislation – Tobacco was a huge financer of the war, and an industry grew out of the aftermath. Causing an epidemic of oral cancer across America.

      Vietnam – A French colony that once independent would tie up the U.S in a bloody conflict for years.

      Olympic Shooting – The world’s first sharpshooters were created in this war, and they would lay the groundwork for an Olympic sport.

      Each topic would come with an explanation of the relationship as well as links to websites were they can learn more. This software is a blend of Google, Wikipedia, Wolfram Alpha, and RSS feeds. If we can simply show the relationships between topics, both academic and cultural/social/pop-culture, we can hopefully open students minds to a wealth of possibilities.

      The real value of Nodes is that it is directly shaped by the contributions of a greater global community. We would provide browser-based widgets that allow people to tag, describe and post articles to the Nodes database. Just as easily as people post to Reddit or Delicious, they could post to a system that helps children around the world become more effective and creative students. Tags could consist of different school subjects that the article relates to as well as interests and potentially careers that are effected by the subject matter. Curators (potentially made up of a community of power users) will help maintain the integrity of the system by helping filter out bad tags, system gaming, etc.

      Nodes can be an excellent resource for students, teachers and parents alike. Teachers use this as a tool to help build lesson plans and to help kids draw connections between what they’re learning and what they’re into. Students use this system as a research tool for homework. Parents use the system to help their kids with their projects.

      via rightbrainsare.us

      My favorite NRBLB concept - captures "seemingly," "connections/metaphors," and "combinations of disparate ideas" in one nice round.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      27 Feb 2011

      Cognitive Wayfinding

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Screen_shot_2011-02-27_at_11

      ...hence things like It's This For That. I sometimes think that human cognition is deeply and fundamentally connection-based. It wouldn't be too far-fetched, considering cognition as just the emergent property of the connections between 100 billion neurons. Maybe the physical corollary of the "landmarks" I have in mind would be something like a group of neurons. 
      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      30 Jan 2011

      from Scott Adams Blog: "Comparing"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      If I could add one required course to every student's education, it would involve learning the skill of comparing.  You might think that comparing alternatives is the domain of common sense, but it isn't. It takes actual training. People who study law, engineering, economics, psychology, and business get different subsets of that training. But many people get none. And it's one of the most important skills that we humans need. Every decision involves some sort of comparison.

      In our current system, the skills you need to compare alternatives are broken into little pieces and spread across several disciplines. A business student might learn about the time value of money while the psychology student is learning about confirmation bias. The math major is studying statistics while the religion student is learning that people will believe just about anything if the context is right.

      My hypothetical curriculum for a course in Comparing might include the following topics:

      Sunk costs

      Time value of money

      The illusion of fairness

      Evaluating risk

      Considering the source of the information

      Considering the wider context

      Limits of human perception

      Statistics (basic)

      Cognitive dissonance

      Confirmation bias

      Famous Lies and Hoaxes

      If I may overgeneralize for a moment, most disagreements have at their core one or more of these four basic causes:

      1.       People have different information

      2.       People have different selfish interests

      3.       People have different superstitions

      4.       People have different skills for comparing

      Of the four causes for disagreement, one is king over the other three. People with strong skills in comparing alternatives can quickly identify in each other where they have differences in information and in selfish interests, and that can be enough to suggest ways to reach agreement, or at least accommodation. (People with skills in comparing generally don't engage in debates about superstition.)

      Lacking the basic skills needed to compare alternatives, two people with different information and a couple of drinks can argue all night long and produce nothing but bad feelings. The same goes for people with different selfish interests and different ethical/moral standards.  But people with good comparison skills can quickly find common ground. In our increasingly complex world, where different cultures are colliding, we'll all need a lot more talent for making the right comparisons.

      Consider the budget debate in the United States. Every knowledgeable observer recognizes that the solution involves both deep cuts in expenses and higher taxes on those who can afford it. And yet our elected officials have framed the issue as one of higher taxes or not, and budget cuts or not. Politicians get away with false comparisons because the majority of voters are not trained in the skill of comparing.  Borrowing a strategy from Gandhi, we need to become the change we seek in the government. Leaders will only make rational comparisons, and therefore rational decisions, when they know that the voters can tell the difference.

      via dilbert.com

      Smart, in a very subtle way. It might not even strike you why immediately. Reminds me ever so slightly of Jason Kottke's idea of "Liberal Arts 2.0" over on kottke.org

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Tags

      • perspective
      • value
      • metasocioculture
      • culture
      • long-term thinking
      • decisionmaking
      • offline inspiration
      • cognitive fallacies
      • future
      • time-orientation
      • limitation
      • perception
      • causality
      • definition
      • irrationality
      • art
      • behavioral economics
      • game mechanics
      • emergence
      • experience
      • exposure
      • observe everything
      • philosophy
      • programming
      • human insight
      • illusion
      • paradox
      • privacy
      • reactionary
      • want
      • worry
      • adaptation
      • advertising
      • behavior
      • design strategy
      • evolution
      • identity
      • networks
      • optimization
      • shortsightedness
      • social interactions
      • weak signals
      • connections
      • counterintuitive
      • doomsday
      • feedback loops
      • indirect
      • meaning
      • tangible data
      • context
      • glanceable
      • memory
      • motivation
      • seeming
      • trends
      • utopia
      • chronological proportionality
      • cognitive environments
      • complexity
      • control
      • cyborg anthropology
      • gaming
      • happiness
      • human programming
      • information art
      • nostalgia
      • rationality
      • scarcity
      • technosocial
      • time
      • timeline
      • Entrepreneur
      • PSEA
      • asking the right questions
      • classification
      • cultural narratives
      • data
      • deception
      • design thinking
      • filter theory
      • games
      • habitat media
      • historical context
      • information theory
      • intelligence
      • levels of abstraction
      • linguistic programming
      • metaphysics
      • nonlinear
      • optimaization
      • organization
      • patina
      • pattern recognition
      • reactive culture
      • serendipity filters
      • truth
      • wisdom
      • wonder
      • youth
    • Archive

      • 2012 (58)
        • May (9)
        • April (14)
        • March (9)
        • February (13)
        • January (13)
      • 2011 (188)
        • December (14)
        • November (6)
        • October (6)
        • September (9)
        • August (9)
        • July (26)
        • June (21)
        • May (12)
        • April (17)
        • March (21)
        • February (25)
        • January (22)
      • 2010 (214)
        • December (22)
        • November (14)
        • October (8)
        • September (7)
        • August (13)
        • July (17)
        • June (16)
        • May (16)
        • April (22)
        • March (36)
        • February (31)
        • January (12)
      • 2009 (95)
        • December (6)
        • November (9)
        • October (9)
        • September (8)
        • August (6)
        • July (2)
        • June (9)
        • May (17)
        • April (7)
        • March (8)
        • February (7)
        • January (7)
      • 2008 (47)
        • December (10)
        • November (12)
        • October (7)
        • September (7)
        • August (4)
        • July (3)
        • May (1)
        • April (1)
        • March (1)
        • January (1)
      • 2007 (4)
        • October (1)
        • September (3)
    • Contributors

      Kyle Cameron Studstill
    • Obox Design
  • How To Break Anything

    Hello friends and collaborators. I deal in innovation, working to build fantastic experiences enabled by the digital world. As part of this I track cultural change, primarily through observations guided by models and filters calibrated over years to sort out the cream.

    These pieces of thoughts here reflect concepts that are elements of those models: ecosystem thinking, long-term value, information filters, and pattern recognition.

    ("How to break anything" is an abstract notion that reflects my background in observation and analysis. Rules are meant to be broken, but only through understanding the rules - observing them with an empathetic eye - can they be broken constructively.

    So how to break anything? Observe everything.

    [You can't observe everything so how do you know what to observe? That's another project that I call Filter Theory - see the About link above.])

    267082 Views
  • Get Updates

    Follow this Space »
    You're following this Space (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook