How To Break Anything

Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.

  • About
  • Weak Signals
  • nanotrends & links
    • 0
      28 Mar 2010

      Yesterday I asked people what superpowers they desired. Result: some thoughts on time travel, decisionmaking, happiness

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Typical times children begin to ask questions, from a lecture at the Medical College of Georgia that @ashleydickinson passed along to me:

      "what" 2 yrs
      "where" 2.6 yrs
      "who" 3.0 yrs
      "whose" 3.0 yrs
      "why" 3.0 yrs
      "how many" 3.0 yrs
      "how" 3 ‐ 6 yrs
      "when" 4 yrs

      This could be interpreted as either a rough scale of abstractness, or a rough scale of what is most salient and critical. Either way, is it surprising that "when" ends up so late on the list? "What" something is, that we can grasp relatively easily. But our concept of time and how we operate within it, that's something we're still so completely far off from understanding.

      "A Rough Scale Of The Abstractness/Salience Of Questions" via howtobreakanything.com

      I was told yesterday that time travel is the ultimate superpower; through time travel you could address every other desire imaginable.

      The respondent began by pointing out how time travel could be used to approximate super speed, strength, and all the other traditional superpowers, but this also speaks deeply to the idea of want/decisionmaking/happiness.

      As you may have heard me say/will hear me say again, the problem with those three things is that we have little capacity to think about them with respect to time. If you shift the time perspective among any of them, their meaning is completely different.

      Consider a basic example of this:

      I 'want' to go back in time to redo x/y/z 'decisions.' That will leave me feeling more 'happy.'

      A small and incomplete list of problems that happen to come to mind:

      1) it's highly likely and in fact guaranteed that you will 'want' something else later when the conditions of your situation have changed (see: "Decisions are about comparison. If you have control over conditions, you have control over decisions.")

      2) decisions are never made in the moment. They are made in the past. (see: "There's not just one decision; "I'm here because of a long chain of events"")

      3) deciding what "happiness" means is the messiest part of talking about free will (see "free will, decision making, and happiness"). This is partially captured by the idea people are trying to express when they say ignorance is bliss. Consider the thought here in reference to the PSFK post Phone App Diagnoses Disease Through Sound:

      What superpower would you want? (Or should I ask "want"?)

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      23 Mar 2010

      Participatory legislation: Citizen co-signing of government documents

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      Screen_shot_2010-03-23_at_11

      Citizen co-signing of government legislation. Fascinating, and similar to how we now have "transparency" of public data - it has always been technically "available," but never before in a way that such a volume of smart people could actually work with it. There are of course countless studies on the effects of participation on feelings of worth, volition, effectiveness, and motivation in general. 

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 2
      10 Feb 2010

      "Everything Is Amazing And Nobody Is Happy"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Media_httprumplos3ama_otxcp
      via rumplo.com

      This has always been the case, and will continue to be the case in the future. Today is not special.

      (this is pretty much just a reiteration of my last post re "the future is scary." How appropriate.)

      UPDATE: @linneamc passed along this clip that I got a good laugh out of. I'd ultimately say that we'll always be able to laugh at our ridiculous expectations; again, the present is no exception. 

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Tags

      • perspective
      • value
      • metasocioculture
      • culture
      • long-term thinking
      • decisionmaking
      • offline inspiration
      • cognitive fallacies
      • future
      • time-orientation
      • limitation
      • perception
      • causality
      • definition
      • irrationality
      • art
      • behavioral economics
      • game mechanics
      • emergence
      • experience
      • exposure
      • observe everything
      • philosophy
      • programming
      • human insight
      • illusion
      • paradox
      • privacy
      • reactionary
      • want
      • worry
      • adaptation
      • advertising
      • behavior
      • design strategy
      • evolution
      • identity
      • metaphors
      • networks
      • optimization
      • shortsightedness
      • social interactions
      • weak signals
      • connections
      • counterintuitive
      • doomsday
      • feedback loops
      • indirect
      • meaning
      • tangible data
      • context
      • glanceable
      • motivation
      • seeming
      • trends
      • utopia
      • cognitive environments
      • complexity
      • control
      • cyborg anthropology
      • gaming
      • human programming
      • information art
      • memory
      • nostalgia
      • rationality
      • scarcity
      • technosocial
      • time
      • timeline
      • Entrepreneur
      • PSEA
      • chronological proportionality
      • classification
      • cultural narratives
      • data
      • deception
      • design thinking
      • filter theory
      • games
      • information theory
      • intelligence
      • levels of abstraction
      • linguistic programming
      • metaphysics
      • nonlinear
      • optimaization
      • organization
      • patina
      • pattern recognition
      • truth
      • wisdom
      • wonder
      • youth
      • Artist
      • MTurk
      • ROI
      • Scientist
      • adversity
    • Archive

      • 2012 (15)
        • February (2)
        • January (13)
      • 2011 (188)
        • December (14)
        • November (6)
        • October (6)
        • September (9)
        • August (9)
        • July (26)
        • June (21)
        • May (12)
        • April (17)
        • March (21)
        • February (25)
        • January (22)
      • 2010 (214)
        • December (22)
        • November (14)
        • October (8)
        • September (7)
        • August (13)
        • July (17)
        • June (16)
        • May (16)
        • April (22)
        • March (36)
        • February (31)
        • January (12)
      • 2009 (95)
        • December (6)
        • November (9)
        • October (9)
        • September (8)
        • August (6)
        • July (2)
        • June (9)
        • May (17)
        • April (7)
        • March (8)
        • February (7)
        • January (7)
      • 2008 (47)
        • December (10)
        • November (12)
        • October (7)
        • September (7)
        • August (4)
        • July (3)
        • May (1)
        • April (1)
        • March (1)
        • January (1)
      • 2007 (4)
        • October (1)
        • September (3)
    • Contributors

      Kyle Cameron Studstill
    • Obox Design
  • How To Break Anything

    Hello friends and collaborators. I deal in innovation, working to build fantastic experiences enabled by the digital world. As part of this I track cultural change, primarily through observations guided by models and filters calibrated over years to sort out the cream.

    These pieces of thoughts here reflect concepts that are elements of those models: ecosystem thinking, long-term value, information filters, and pattern recognition.

    ("How to break anything" is an abstract notion that reflects my background in observation and analysis. Rules are meant to be broken, but only through understanding the rules - observing them with an empathetic eye - can they be broken constructively.

    So how to break anything? Observe everything.

    [You can't observe everything so how do you know what to observe? That's another project that I call Filter Theory - see the About link above.])

    254026 Views
  • Get Updates

    Follow this Space »
    You're following this Space (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook