How To Break Anything

Thoughts and insights on culture and human behavior, living blissfully at the intersection of rationality and irrationality (but mostly irrationality) 
Filed under

decisionmaking

 

From: Brooklyn Brainery!: Irrational Decisions wrapup

Kyle's How To Make Irrational Decisions wrapped up on Monday. I took plenty of notes, so let's go through the things that complicate the choices we make, then look at what we can do to make our decisions easier!

Why Making Decisions Is So Hard

Every time we make a decision, we're looking at two different parts of the result, what we get and when we get it. Sometimes deciding between the two is easy. Do I want $50 or $80? I'll take $80, thanks! Do I want it now or a month from now? Now, obviously!

Life isn't like that, though - the whats and the whens get all mixed up, and the decisions get harder. $50 now or $80 a month from now? Sure, having $50 in your hand right now feels a lot better, but an extra $30 sure makes waiting attractive. Let's illustrate this with adorable children waiting for marshmallows:

There are three different ways to focus your energy - the past, the present, and the future. Would you just eat the first marshmallow? You're present-oriented. Would you wait for the second? Future-oriented. Things like studying hard in school or saving for retirement are good examples of being future-oriented out in the non-marshmallow-related world.

But oh, oh, oh, it gets harder, even! Once uncertainty comes into the picture, everything gets much worse. Do you want $50, or a 50% chance at winning $100, but if you lose you get nothing? Math gives us a way of comparing the two - multiplying the probability by the payout gives the "expected payoff". $100 times 50% is $50, and $50 times 100% is also $50 - math is telling us the two are the same, but our brains sure don't think that way. (Confused? Check this out, or just trust me!)

Once outcomes are uncertain everything becomes a lot more personal. Do you just need $50 to buy a pair of new shoes, or do you really need that $100 to make rent? Are you a risk taker? This is all under the umbrella of risk aversion, which gets a lot more complicated if you head over to Wikipedia.

Now, once we start thinking about how "personal" a decision is we need to start thinking about what that really means. We have an idea that we operate in our own little sphere and are in complete control of all of our ideas and actions, when that's really not true at all.

If you ask someone to write down the word "see" half of people will write 'see' and the other half will write 'sea.' If you make a waving motion with your hand, though, suddenly everyone's writing 'sea.' Right, waves! Every decision you make is influenced by things you've experienced recently, and this is called priming (Wikipedia). Holding a cold drink will make you think more negatively than a hot one. If you just watched a romantic comedy, it might be harder to break up with your boyfriend. You don't make decisions in a vacuum.

Priming doesn't necessarily make decisions easier or harder, it's just something that complicates the idea of making a "best" or "rational" decision - what you think is a perfectly thought-out decision right now might not be the same an hour later after you've had to sit on the subway for a while, or look at an ad, or aren't nearly so hungry. Realizing that in every moment your choices are going to look a little different can go a long way in relaxing about decision-making.

While talking about the "best" decision, regret is an important aspect. Once you've made a decision, you're locking out all the choices you didn't make. You might have a tendency to fixate on everything you've lost out on when you make a decision - this is called the opportunity cost. If you buy this shirt you can't buy those shoes, or how taking one job prevents you from taking another.

Another big thing is sunk costs, which is anything you've spent on something that you can't get back. These costs usually make you want to go further with something, even if you don't like it: spending years in a relationship is a deterrent to leaving it, spending thousands on grad school makes you determined to work in a specific field. I think these are big big big factors when dealing with long-term, important decisions.

Okay, enough depressing stuff, let's talk about how we can make some better decisions!

How to Make Better Decisions

The most important thing about making better decisions is acknowledging that there are a lot of factors at play, and nothing you do is the One True Best Awesome Decision.

The past, the present, the future - all of these are different times to revel in, and one isn't necessarily better than the other. Saving for retirement is a good example: partying down now might seem wasteful to some people, but you don't know if you'll even be alive in 50 years to enjoy the money that you've saved. Maybe spending that money on seeing a band is going to mean more to you than an extra night on a Seniors Cruise down the line. On the other hand, giving up that extra drink might be worth not living in a cardboard box later down the road. Chances are you're looking for balance.

Uncertainty isn't always a bad thing. Understand that there are always unknowns. While we used the $50 or 50% chance at $100 example before, nothing in life is ever that clean-cut. Uncertainty exists along the way, just not in the results. When you go to grad school, you aren't just taking a gamble that you'll get a fancy job when you get out of school - you're also meeting new people and experiencing things you wouldn't have if you were just out in the working world. In the same way, if you get a job instead of going to school you're amassing experiences and business contacts, and each of those interactions changes where your decision is taking you.

Kyle brought up chaos theory as a way of thinking about this - life isn't just X causes Y, it's X sends you towards Y, A interrupts, steers you towards B, but then C edges you back in the direction of W, and etc etc etc forever and ever. No matter how well-informed you are, you never have perfect information about what a decision is going to do and what it is going to mean in the future.

An important take-away from the class for me was that when you are making a decision, you aren't determining the result. When you pick someone to date, that's all you're picking - you haven't secured them in eternal marriage, you don't know if you'll hate how they fold laundry in six years, you don't know if you'll fall for an especially charming gas station attendant. All decisions can do is guide you in a direction, not guarantee an outcome, so you definitely have room to relax.

We talked about priming before, the idea that everything around you is affecting your decision-making. I think the best way to deal with this is to just acknowledge that it exists and move on. Understand that even though you might love to be 100% in control and perfectly rational all of the time, it just can't happen. You can try to look around and see what recent experiences are influencing your decisions, but don't stress out about it too much. Experiences are what make us who we are, and a decision influenced by them is no more or less natural than something perfectly "rational."

The most important thing to remember about sunk costs is that sunk costs are sunk. You are not getting them back, no matter what, so just ignore them! You buy tickets to a baseball game, but it's raining. Don't go. You're miserable in your relationship, but you've been there for 5 years, and you feel like you owe it to all of that effort to keep on going. You don't. You aren't getting your time or money back, so go ahead and make the decision that will make you happiest in the future. Realizing that sunk costs are so much of the reason you want to go to the game or stay in the relationship will help empower you to make the tough decision to ignore the costs and do what will make you happy.

A fun idea some people brought up was the mindset that "Every Decision I Make Is Right." Instead of worrying about your decisions, you just make them, and trust that you've done the right thing. Just like the fox and the grapes, sometimes the way you think about things is even more important than what actually happened.

The toughest part about making a decision is the period before you actually make it. You stress out, you overthink things, you take ages of pain to come to a conclusion. Just decide! There are enough unknowns out there that neither can really be the best, I promise. My rule of thumb is to take the path that seems to give you the most options down the road - even if you didn't make the "right" decision right now, one of those choices later on is sure to make up for it. So just embrace the fact that there's a lot more going on that you could ever account for, take a deep relaxing breath, and go on making those irrational decisions!

Jonathan Soma over at the Brooklyn Brainery posted this fantastic write up of the How To Make Irrational Decisions class. A nice blend of topics I introduced, and how those are interpreted by someone other than myself.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   causality   context   decisionmaking   irrationality   want  

Comments [0]

One possible heuristic for optimizing decisions

Yesterday at my Brooklyn Brainery class on decisionmaking, the discussion got to the point where people were asking about optimization. The question here is primarily: "given that when making a decisions, too short of a time perspective is meaningless (caring only about petty things), and too long of one is equally meaningless (caring only about 300 years in the future), is there some optimal time perspective (or shifting of time perspective) that will lead to the best decisions? What heuristics do people use?"


I essentially answered "there are none." I later got to thinking that this isn't entirely true. 

The temptation to answer that way comes from the too-simple and too-common perspective that every decision is the best decision. That is to say, no decision is better than any other.

That is to say, deciding to sit on the couch all day is just as much as "right" decision as deciding to go out and change someone's life.

I think when it comes to thinking about value, and what experiences are valuable, the "every decision is right" approach is plainly absurd.

The right heuristic might be: if it's something you don't want to do because it makes you uncomfortable, it's definitely the better decision. 

(There's actually a lot deeper thinking available on the matter, that makes the above look like the perspective of a 3rd grader: What Is Wei Dai's Updateless Decision Theory?)
 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking   optimization   value  

Comments [2]

Better financial decisionmaking through contextual data feedback

Merry Miser map

Merry Miser is a mobile application that helps its users to make better decisions about spending. The application uses the context provided by a user's location and financial history to provide personalized interventions when the user is near an opportunity to spend. The interventions, which are motivated by prior research in positive psychology, persuasive technology and shopping psychology, consist of informational displays about context-relevant spending history, subjective assessments of past purchases, personal budgets, and savings goals.

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   behavioral economics   decisionmaking  

Comments [0]

"The future has no place to come from but the past, hence the past has predictive value."

 
More thoughts on "the future is in the past," this time from Neustadt and May of Thinking in Time: The Uses of History For Decision Makers.

The above appeared in the notes section of Tyack & Cuban's Tinkering Toward Utopia.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking   future   offline inspiration  

Comments [0]

A thought on what people are 'deciding' upon when choosing/not choosing to share (re: Open Graph, privacy, etc)

Facebook Open Graph

And what about privacy?
Is this another nail in the coffin of the very concept of privacy? In the future will we really share everything? Ultimately people will be the ones to decide what they want to share and with whom. But now it will be not only what happens on Facebook.com, but everything happening outside it too.

The above from We Are Social's longer synopsis of Facebook Open Graph.

What I'm interested in is the statement above on privacy. Particularly re: 'deciding.'

It illuminates the question: what is it exactly that you're 'deciding' upon when you "decide what to share and with whom"?

Rather, I should ask: what are the conditions within which you are deciding?

I'd imagine you'd be making a completely different decision between choosing to what to share within two different environments:

1) no one shares anything about themselves online (10 years pre-facebook)
2) everyone shares everything about themselves online (10 years post-facebook)

And ultimately that has little to do with the 'decision' itself, and much more to do with the conditions within which the decision is made.

Just something to consider as you decide ('decide'?) how this all makes you feel about 'privacy.'

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking   privacy  

Comments [2]

Quick thought on cultural influence re: what counts as a decision, from The Art Of Choosing

Take a mundane question: Do you choose to brush your teeth in the morning? Or do you just do it? Can a habit or custom be a choice? When Iyengar asked Japanese and American college students in Kyoto to record all the choices they made in a day, the Americans included things like brushing their teeth and hitting the snooze button. The Japanese didn’t consider those actions to be choices. The two groups lived similar lives. But they defined them differently.

The NYT reviews Sheena Iyengar's The Art of Choosing. The above is one of my favorites of the many excellent ideas expressed within.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   culture   decisionmaking   perspective  

Comments [0]

A few minutes ago I used Mechanical Turk to ask people about the best decision they've made in the last 5 days

 

Already getting some great responses. Going to be using Mechanical Turk much more often. 

(didn't really mean to highlight that last one, it just happened to be where my mouse was. Plenty of other insightful responses)

 

UPDATE: I've included the final results in the excel sheet below.

 

Almost all the responses are about jobs - quitting jobs, deciding on jobs, declining jobs, changing careers, etc.

Almost all the rest are about relationships. 

 

(download)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking  

Comments [0]

April 13, 2010: Kyle Cameron Studstill - the3six5's posterous

 

[This post originally appeared on the3six5.posterous.com]

I think a lot on decisionmaking, so today I asked my Twitter friends what they think of as the best decision they've made in the last five years. Interested primarily in comparing this to decisions made in the last five days I was surprised when someone asked the same of me, but I managed to come up with "deciding to floss every day" as my response.

Decisionmaking is primarily about "want," and flossing every day exemplifies the idea that the word "want" is such a ridiculously lacking term to express the phenomenon for which it has been charged to capture. This is primarily because "want" expresses nothing with respect to time; a critical shortcoming, because on a short enough timeline, nobody "wants" anything.

In the moments leading up to the flossing is it really something I "want" to do? Not particularly. I find it annoyingly time-consuming.

What I "want" is a certain feeling - it comes along with recognizing that following through on decisions is an unexplainably easy and incredibly rewarding thing to do. Well it is if you're looking in retrospect, anyway - it's a future "want."

This is one of the best decisions I've made because I can apply it to everything that seems uncomfortable in the present.

It's why I woke up immediately to my alarm this morning after (very) minimal sleep, stood right up and got on with the day. There's always that part of me that doesn't "want" to get up, but there's a more clever part of me that knows my RSS reader is as good as coffee and once I fire it up I'll have forgotten the feeling altogether. I read the latest lesswrong.org post everyday and today's was dreadfully dense - as always - but after fighting that short-term "want" I walked away with a piece of something intelligent - as always.

On a short enough timeline most worthwhile things seem unnecessary, uncomfortable, ridiculous, like wastes of time/effort. The bad news is that feeling never goes away; we're naturally inclined to see the world in short moment-to-moment timelines.

The good news is that shifting one's perspective is completely in our control, and entirely worth it. Ask Walter Michel.

[img via Oh, The Temptation]

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking   perspective   time-orientation  

Comments [0]

Yesterday I asked people what superpowers they desired. Result: some thoughts on time travel, decisionmaking, happiness

Typical times children begin to ask questions, from a lecture at the Medical College of Georgia that @ashleydickinson passed along to me:

"what" 2 yrs
"where" 2.6 yrs
"who" 3.0 yrs
"whose" 3.0 yrs
"why" 3.0 yrs
"how many" 3.0 yrs
"how" 3 ‐ 6 yrs
"when" 4 yrs

This could be interpreted as either a rough scale of abstractness, or a rough scale of what is most salient and critical. Either way, is it surprising that "when" ends up so late on the list? "What" something is, that we can grasp relatively easily. But our concept of time and how we operate within it, that's something we're still so completely far off from understanding.

"A Rough Scale Of The Abstractness/Salience Of Questions" via howtobreakanything.com

I was told yesterday that time travel is the ultimate superpower; through time travel you could address every other desire imaginable.

The respondent began by pointing out how time travel could be used to approximate super speed, strength, and all the other traditional superpowers, but this also speaks deeply to the idea of want/decisionmaking/happiness.

As you may have heard me say/will hear me say again, the problem with those three things is that we have little capacity to think about them with respect to time. If you shift the time perspective among any of them, their meaning is completely different.

Consider a basic example of this:

I 'want' to go back in time to redo x/y/z 'decisions.' That will leave me feeling more 'happy.'

A small and incomplete list of problems that happen to come to mind:

1) it's highly likely and in fact guaranteed that you will 'want' something else later when the conditions of your situation have changed (see: "Decisions are about comparison. If you have control over conditions, you have control over decisions.")

2) decisions are never made in the moment. They are made in the past. (see: "There's not just one decision; "I'm here because of a long chain of events"")

3) deciding what "happiness" means is the messiest part of talking about free will (see "free will, decision making, and happiness"). This is partially captured by the idea people are trying to express when they say ignorance is bliss. Consider the thought here in reference to the PSFK post Phone App Diagnoses Disease Through Sound:

What superpower would you want? (Or should I ask "want"?)

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   causality   decisionmaking   happiness   perspective   time-orientation   want  

Comments [0]

Pulitzer Prize-winning jazz musician Wynton Marsalis on improvisation and imagination, related to choice/rational decisionmaking

"...where there might only be noise. Insisting on more when one already has enough is usually considered greed. In the case of choice, it is also a sign of the failure of the imagination."

[from The Art Of Choosing, Sheena Iyengar]

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   decisionmaking   irrationality  

Comments [0]

My Blogroll: