How To Break Anything

Innovation + experience-minded design strategy. The pieces of a working model for understanding culture + change in an increasingly complex world.

  • About
  • Weak Signals
  • nanotrends & links
    • 0
      12 Apr 2012

      Progress, serendipity, and chronological proprotionality

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      At first glance,

      Media_http27mediatumb_gzxld

      via altnytterfarlig.tumblr.com

      and 

      Screen_shot_2012-04-12_at_9

      from "Google’s New Glasses And The War On Serendipity" via new-aesthetic.tumblr.com

      seem to be opposing viewpoints, no? 

      This apparent paradox could be seen as just an illusion of scale, perhaps. As in:

      - Large things with major impacts benefit from a reduction in the amount of randomness, which leads to progress

      - Small things with minor impacts benefit from an increase in the amount of randomness, which leads to serendipity

      Which would be nice, because then all you'd have to do is figure out the difference between large things and small things, sorting based on their scope of impact.

      Though unfortunately for our solution here, the historian Frank Gavin calls this the assesment of "chronological proportionality," noting that it's something humans are notoriously terrible at (see: Five Ways To Use History Well). 

      Not sure I have a better solution for you right away, just something to consider as you too wrestle with notions like progress and serendipity.

       

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      29 Jul 2011

      a flavor of Chronological Proportionality, from "Why The Concept of 'Technology' Is Dangerous"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      We amplify the hazardous character of the concept by investing it with agency—by using the word technology as the subject of active verbs. Take, for example, a stock historical generalization such as: “the cotton-picking machine transformed the southern agricultural economy and set off the Great Migration of black farm workers to northern cities.” Here we tacitly invest a machine with the power to initiate change, as if it were capable of altering the course of events, of history itself. By treating these inanimate objects—machines—as causal agents, we divert attention from the human (especially socioeconomic and political) relations responsible for precipitating this social upheaval. Contemporary discourse, private and public, is filled with hackneyed vignettes of technologically activated social change— pithy accounts of “the direction technology is taking us” or “changing our lives.”
      via etc.technologyandculture.net

      I see this as related to Frank Gavin's notion of Chronological Proportionality, which he describes in Five Ways To Use History Well: http://longnow.org/seminars/02010/jul/12/five-ways-use-history-well/

      Misattributing chronological proportionality to tangible events is the danger of underestimating the complexity of information and impacts.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • 0
      21 Apr 2011

      Chronological Proportionality as applied to "You're Missing Out on Everything"

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost

      This article below resonates with me because I've become increasingly amused by notions like Fear Of MIssing Out, and by statements like "MUST READ," "essential," etc. These notions are fascinating in their ability to affect us in spite of their meaningless - but I'm not sure it's necessarily a good kind of impact. 

      Because we have a finite amount of time with which to focus our attention, and because we feel the pressure to make the "best" decision around where to do so, I'm laterally reminded of Frank Gavin and his notion of Chronological Proportionality. A historian by trade, this is Gavin's way of expressing our tendency to place proportional relevance on specific events an an attempt to better understand causality, specifically as it relates to our understanding of history. As Gavin notes in his talks on the matter, humanity has an entire history of being completely wrong when going about this task.

      While focused on understanding the causal relationships between events, I think the idea applies just as well when it comes to the causal relationships between decisions and happiness. That is to say, we feel the pressure to always make the best decision about how to spend our time - regardless of the fact that we're almost certainly completely wrong about whether this MUST READ or that *essential* article really is that proportionally critical.

       
      You're missing out on everything
      Published on Kottke | shared via feedly

      There's just not enough time in a lifetime to see every movie, read every book, travel to every country, hear every song, watch every show, or view every sculpture. And that's ok:

      It's sad, but it's also ... great, really. Imagine if you'd seen everything good, or if you knew about everything good. Imagine if you really got to all the recordings and books and movies you're "supposed to see." Imagine you got through everybody's list, until everything you hadn't read didn't really need reading. That would imply that all the cultural value the world has managed to produce since a glob of primordial ooze first picked up a violin is so tiny and insignificant that a single human being can gobble all of it in one lifetime. That would make us failures, I think.

      • views
      • Tweet
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Tags

      • perspective
      • value
      • metasocioculture
      • culture
      • long-term thinking
      • decisionmaking
      • offline inspiration
      • cognitive fallacies
      • future
      • time-orientation
      • limitation
      • perception
      • causality
      • definition
      • irrationality
      • art
      • behavioral economics
      • game mechanics
      • emergence
      • experience
      • exposure
      • observe everything
      • philosophy
      • programming
      • human insight
      • illusion
      • paradox
      • privacy
      • reactionary
      • want
      • worry
      • adaptation
      • advertising
      • behavior
      • design strategy
      • evolution
      • identity
      • metaphors
      • networks
      • optimization
      • shortsightedness
      • social interactions
      • weak signals
      • connections
      • counterintuitive
      • doomsday
      • feedback loops
      • indirect
      • meaning
      • tangible data
      • context
      • glanceable
      • memory
      • motivation
      • seeming
      • trends
      • utopia
      • cognitive environments
      • complexity
      • control
      • cyborg anthropology
      • gaming
      • happiness
      • human programming
      • information art
      • nostalgia
      • rationality
      • scarcity
      • technosocial
      • time
      • timeline
      • Entrepreneur
      • PSEA
      • asking the right questions
      • classification
      • cultural narratives
      • data
      • deception
      • design thinking
      • filter theory
      • games
      • habitat media
      • historical context
      • information theory
      • intelligence
      • levels of abstraction
      • linguistic programming
      • metaphysics
      • nonlinear
      • optimaization
      • organization
      • patina
      • pattern recognition
      • reactive culture
      • serendipity filters
      • truth
      • wisdom
      • wonder
      • youth
    • Archive

      • 2012 (58)
        • May (9)
        • April (14)
        • March (9)
        • February (13)
        • January (13)
      • 2011 (188)
        • December (14)
        • November (6)
        • October (6)
        • September (9)
        • August (9)
        • July (26)
        • June (21)
        • May (12)
        • April (17)
        • March (21)
        • February (25)
        • January (22)
      • 2010 (214)
        • December (22)
        • November (14)
        • October (8)
        • September (7)
        • August (13)
        • July (17)
        • June (16)
        • May (16)
        • April (22)
        • March (36)
        • February (31)
        • January (12)
      • 2009 (95)
        • December (6)
        • November (9)
        • October (9)
        • September (8)
        • August (6)
        • July (2)
        • June (9)
        • May (17)
        • April (7)
        • March (8)
        • February (7)
        • January (7)
      • 2008 (47)
        • December (10)
        • November (12)
        • October (7)
        • September (7)
        • August (4)
        • July (3)
        • May (1)
        • April (1)
        • March (1)
        • January (1)
      • 2007 (4)
        • October (1)
        • September (3)
    • Contributors

      Kyle Cameron Studstill
    • Obox Design
  • How To Break Anything

    Hello friends and collaborators. I deal in innovation, working to build fantastic experiences enabled by the digital world. As part of this I track cultural change, primarily through observations guided by models and filters calibrated over years to sort out the cream.

    These pieces of thoughts here reflect concepts that are elements of those models: ecosystem thinking, long-term value, information filters, and pattern recognition.

    ("How to break anything" is an abstract notion that reflects my background in observation and analysis. Rules are meant to be broken, but only through understanding the rules - observing them with an empathetic eye - can they be broken constructively.

    So how to break anything? Observe everything.

    [You can't observe everything so how do you know what to observe? That's another project that I call Filter Theory - see the About link above.])

    267085 Views
  • Get Updates

    Follow this Space »
    You're following this Space (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your Space (Edit)
    Follow by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook